From 982cda69764ac0575125bc8786177e48f5fd9420 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zeertzjq Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:03:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] patch 9.1.1610: completion: hang or E684 when 'tagfunc' calls complete() Problem: completion: hang (after 9.1.1471) or E684 (after 9.1.1410) when 'tagfunc' calls complete(). Solution: Check if complete() has been called immediately after getting matches instead of in the next loop iteration (zeertzjq). related: #1668 related: neovim/neovim#34416 related: neovim/neovim#35163 closes: #17929 Signed-off-by: zeertzjq Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt --- src/insexpand.c | 10 +++++----- src/testdir/test_ins_complete.vim | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/version.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/insexpand.c b/src/insexpand.c index 5b4afb9e43..3a775422d7 100644 --- a/src/insexpand.c +++ b/src/insexpand.c @@ -5515,11 +5515,6 @@ ins_compl_get_exp(pos_T *ini) } } - // If complete() was called then compl_pattern has been reset. The - // following won't work then, bail out. - if (compl_pattern.string == NULL) - break; - if (compl_autocomplete && type == CTRL_X_FUNCTION) // LSP servers may sporadically take >1s to respond (e.g., while // loading modules), but other sources might already have matches. @@ -5532,6 +5527,11 @@ ins_compl_get_exp(pos_T *ini) // get the next set of completion matches found_new_match = get_next_completion_match(type, &st, &start_pos); + // If complete() was called then compl_pattern has been reset. The + // following won't work then, bail out. + if (compl_pattern.string == NULL) + break; + if (may_advance_cpt_idx) { if (!advance_cpt_sources_index_safe()) diff --git a/src/testdir/test_ins_complete.vim b/src/testdir/test_ins_complete.vim index 560b2c424e..1ec71118c9 100644 --- a/src/testdir/test_ins_complete.vim +++ b/src/testdir/test_ins_complete.vim @@ -3221,6 +3221,35 @@ func Test_tagfunc_wipes_out_buffer() bwipe! endfunc +func s:TagfuncComplete(t,f,o) + call complete(1, ['ddd', 'eee', 'fff']) + return [] +endfunc + +" 'tagfunc' calling complete() should not cause hang or E684. +func Test_tagfunc_calls_complete() + new + call setline(1, ['aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc']) + setlocal tagfunc=s:TagfuncComplete + setlocal completeopt=menu,noselect + + let v:errmsg = '' + + " This used to hang. + setlocal complete=.,t + call feedkeys("Go\\\", 'tx') + call assert_equal('', getline('.')) + call assert_equal('', v:errmsg) + + " This used to cause E684. + setlocal complete=t,. + call feedkeys("cc\\\", 'tx') + call assert_equal('', getline('.')) + call assert_equal('', v:errmsg) + + bwipe! +endfunc + func Test_ins_complete_popup_position() CheckScreendump diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c index 4abf6025d2..e2c46855e4 100644 --- a/src/version.c +++ b/src/version.c @@ -719,6 +719,8 @@ static char *(features[]) = static int included_patches[] = { /* Add new patch number below this line */ +/**/ + 1610, /**/ 1609, /**/