updated for version 7.0001
This commit is contained in:
47
runtime/macros/urm/README.txt
Normal file
47
runtime/macros/urm/README.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
This is another proof that Vim is perfectly compatible with Vi.
|
||||
The URM macro package was written by Rudolf Koenig ("Rudi")
|
||||
(rudolf@koeniglich.de) for hpux-vi in August 1991.
|
||||
|
||||
Getting started:
|
||||
|
||||
type
|
||||
in your shell: vim urm<RETURN>
|
||||
in vim: :so urm.vim<RETURN>
|
||||
in vim: * (to load the registers and boot the URM-machine :-)
|
||||
in vim: g (for 'go') and watch the fun. Per default, 3 and 4
|
||||
are multiplied. Watch the Program counter, it is
|
||||
visible as a komma moving around.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a "standard URM" (Universal register machine) interpreter. The URM
|
||||
concept is used in theoretical computer science to aid in theorem proving.
|
||||
Here it proves that vim is a general problem solver (if you bring enough
|
||||
patience).
|
||||
|
||||
The interpreter begins with register 1 (not 0), without macros and more-lines
|
||||
capability. A dot marks the end of a program. (Bug: there must be a space
|
||||
after the dot.)
|
||||
|
||||
The registers are the first few lines, beginning with a '>' .
|
||||
The program is the first line after the registers.
|
||||
You should always initialize the registers required by the program.
|
||||
|
||||
Output register: line 2
|
||||
Input registers: line 2 to ...
|
||||
|
||||
Commands:
|
||||
a<n> increment register <n>
|
||||
s<n> decrement register <n>
|
||||
<x>;<y> execute command <x> and then <y>
|
||||
(<x>)<n> execute command <x> while register <n> is nonzero
|
||||
. ("dot blank") halt the machine.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
Add register 2 to register 3:
|
||||
(a2;s3)3.
|
||||
Multiply register 2 with register 3:
|
||||
(a4;a5;s2)2; ((a2;s4)4; s3; (a1;a4;s5)5; (a5;s1)1)3.
|
||||
|
||||
There are more (complicated) examples in the file examples.
|
||||
Note, undo may take a while after a division.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user