1
0
forked from Alepha/Alepha

Online documentation for single-letter options.

It's mostly worked out, but there's a few odd corner cases,
especially around the auto-gen of negation options.  It also
got me to start thinking about "is a required negatable option
still required of its negation?"  Similar questions revolve
around requiring such options.

I'm punting on these for now, but I think it makes sense to
perhaps make those incompatible with such domains.  Or to treat
the two options as a shared-fate unit.  But is `-O -o -O -o` a
violation of exclusivity?  If we wind up returning to the default
state, have we actually passed that option, with respect to
"requirement"?  I have to think about that some more.

A commit message isn't the best place to capture this, but I
didn't want to lose this thought.
This commit is contained in:
2025-09-06 02:36:17 -04:00
parent e41198c294
commit 95e6f1ac04
2 changed files with 61 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -16,11 +16,16 @@ namespace
bool optionC= false;
const Alepha::RequirementDomain need;
const Alepha::ExclusivityDomain block;
//const Alepha::detail::ProgramOptions_m::Domain< nil > need;
//const Alepha::detail::ProgramOptions_m::Domain< nil > block;
auto init= enroll <=[]
{
--"set-a"_option << optionA << "The option is an integer. !default!";
--"set-b"_option << optionB << "The option is a string, no defaults.";
--"set-c"_option << optionC << "This sets the 'C' flag.";
--"set-a"_option << need << optionA << "The option is an integer. !default!";
--"set-b"_option << block << optionB << "The option is a string, no defaults.";
--"set-c"_option << block << need << optionC << "This sets the 'C' flag.";
};
}
@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ int
main( const int argcnt, const char *const *const argvec )
try
{
const auto args= Alepha::handleOptions( argcnt, argvec, { { 'c', "set-c" }, { 'C', "no-set-c" } } );
const auto args= Alepha::handleOptions( argcnt, argvec, { { 'c', "set-c" }, { 'C', "no-set-c" }, { 'D', "dump-color-env-var" },
{ 'L', "list-color-variables" }, } );
std::cout << "A is set to: " << optionA << std::endl;
std::cout << "B is set to: " << ( optionB.has_value() ? optionB.value() : "nullopt"s ) << std::endl;